April 6, 2008

"Having this baby doesn't make me any less of a man."

Justin Katz

So how much of the Brave New World will be purely a matter of semantics?

The man who stunned the world when he announced he was pregnant gave an intimate insight into his personal life in a revealing television interview with Oprah.

Thomas Beatie stripped off for the cameras and bared his baby bump and also revealed pictures from his beauty queen days as a young woman.

However, the 34-year-old transsexual also told chat show host Oprah Winfrey that he feared for his own safety and admitted doctors had warned him his baby could be killed because of the revulsion at her birth.

As a pure example of the mainstreaming of relativism, it appears that Beatie is a man mostly because he/she claims to be so:

Beatie legally became a man after undergoing a sex change operation - but kept her female reproductive organs.

He told People magazine he decided to get pregnant after wife of five years Nancy had a hysterectomy.

He. Her. Small breasts and facial hair. Womb.

Poor child.

Comments, although monitored, are not necessarily representative of the views Anchor Rising's contributors or approved by them. We reserve the right to delete or modify comments for any reason.

I'm still not convinced that this isn't Ashton's latest punk the tabloid media project.

Posted by: Greg at April 6, 2008 6:13 PM

Freak show!

In the public schools this'll be portrayed as "normal" and a victory for "diversity."

Posted by: Ragin' Rhode Islander at April 6, 2008 7:10 PM

Ragin', its worse than that. In some schools around the country (high probability in Mass.) kids will be encouraged to "explore" this "option", or as they might call it "alternative".

Great read on the subject =

Persecution -- by David Limbaugh

Posted by: George at April 6, 2008 7:22 PM

Shame on Oprah Winfrey for exploiting this poor soul.

Posted by: brassband at April 6, 2008 7:57 PM

What $1,000,000.00 will make a woman--OOPS!--man or she/he????--do!

Posted by: Ken at April 6, 2008 9:31 PM

Gee, I wonder if under Elizabeth Roberts / Hillary Clinton Barack Obama universal health care plans we taxpayers would be required to pay for the "change to" operations?

We know the answer, don't we?

Posted by: Ragin' Rhode Islander at April 6, 2008 10:44 PM

There's no more or political consquence to this guy at all. Sometimes a kook is just a kook.

Posted by: rhoidy at April 7, 2008 1:10 AM

Outrageous is all I can say...

Posted by: Dameure at April 14, 2008 10:03 AM
Post a comment

Remember personal info?

Important note: The text "http:" cannot appear anywhere in your comment.