November 11, 2006

ProJo's "Editorial Mystery" Solved

Marc Comtois

I posted before about the questions that Ian Donnis was asking regarding the mysterious non-publishing of an editorial by the ProJo in which they attempt to justify endorsing"Yes on 1." (For posterity, I also included the text of the online only editorial). Now it appears as if there was no need. This morning's (Saturday) Op-Ed page contains the piece, titled "Editorial Mysteries." Indeed, it has been a mystery! Why did the editorial vanish? Why publish it now, so late after the election (on a Saturday, no less)? What could have possibly changed their mind? Regardless, my original problems with the piece still stand.

Comments, although monitored, are not necessarily representative of the views Anchor Rising's contributors or approved by them. We reserve the right to delete or modify comments for any reason.

I was amused by Howard Sutton's "well, all the other media endorsed it" defense. The real question, which he didn't answer, is: why the 180 regarding the casino?

Posted by: Rhody at November 11, 2006 5:33 PM
Post a comment

Remember personal info?

Important note: The text "http:" cannot appear anywhere in your comment.