March 22, 2012

Note to the General Treasurer: If George Nee Supports It, It Is Definitively Not "Sound Fiscal Policy"

Monique Chartier

Kudos to WPRI for bringing this to light.

Treasurer Gina Raimondo is urging lawmakers to reject a little-noticed proposal by Governor Chafee to shave $2.6 million off the amount taxpayers must put into the pension fund next year.

The governor’s proposed 2012-13 budget would scrap a seven-year-old law mandating that if the state’s required pension contribution rate falls from one year to the next, taxpayers must put 20% of the reduction into the pension fund anyway.

Inexplicably, the General Treasurer doesn't want to scrap this financially infeasible law. She wants the state - not exactly awash in surpluses - to somehow put that 20% in anyway.

”After thoughtful analysis, Treasury concluded that the policy should remain in effect and therefore did not recommend a change to this statute,” she wrote in a letter to House Finance Committee Chairman Helio Melo obtained by

As Treasury's analysis does not specify where the money would come from, it's not clear how "thoughtful" the analysis could be. The Governor's office noticed this absence of source, too. (This is all very confusing. I thought Treasurer Raimondo and not Governor Chafee was the fiscally prudent General Officer of the state.)

“In each of these years, we would need to provide this additional funding instead of having the savings accrue to the budget,” [Gubernatorial spokeswoman Christine] Hunsinger told “Our proposal helps address the projected out-year deficits by not having to allocate funds to this purpose.” The state is on track to run a $349 million deficit in 2015-16.

However, that little detail doesn't seem to bother at least one fan of doing things the old way.

Rhode Island AFL-CIO President George Nee praised Raimondo’s position. “The labor movement appreciates the treasurer weighing in on the side of our members,” he said in an email. “The present law is sound fiscal policy and should remain unchanged.”
Comments, although monitored, are not necessarily representative of the views Anchor Rising's contributors or approved by them. We reserve the right to delete or modify comments for any reason.

On a side note, I watched Gina on CNBC this morning. Based on what I saw, no matter who runs against her for whatever office, she'll likely smoke them in a debate. She's pretty comfortable in front of the camera even when she's challenged.

Posted by: Max D. at March 23, 2012 11:56 AM

She's a charlatan. Doesn't have she-it to say about the obscene municipal pension systems.
She's not a good person who did a good thing. She's an evil person who did a good thing because circumstances forced it-and for political gain.

Posted by: Tommy Cranston at March 24, 2012 12:32 PM

I can't argue her character Tommy. I'm just reporting an observation. She was very confident and comfortable.

On a side note, while she didn't say she wasn't supporting the governor's new municipal plan, she did say that the reason why they didn't go after plans outside of the state plans was the complications created by the existence of bargaining agreements. Sorry but in my opinion Chafee will have a big problem with that.

Posted by: Max D at March 24, 2012 2:14 PM

"in my opinion Chafee will have a big problem with that."

... then we all will, taxpayers and retirees.

Posted by: Monique at March 24, 2012 6:57 PM

"... then we all will, taxpayers and retirees."


Posted by: Max D at March 25, 2012 12:33 AM

Taxpayers in RI are like the proverbial caged rodent on a treadmill. They keep expending only to find they haven't gone anywhere. Meanwhile union masters and phonies like Raimondo want to take your money to purchase a bigger cage.

Posted by: ANTHONY at March 25, 2012 11:29 PM
Post a comment

Remember personal info?

Important note: The text "http:" cannot appear anywhere in your comment.