February 9, 2011

Rudderless Rhode Island: National Perception is Reality

Marc Comtois

Steve Malanga at RealClearMarkets gives us the national perspective of what's going on in Rhode Island (h/t Jim Hackett via Facebook):

Tucked in between Massachusetts and Connecticut and overshadowed in Northeastern political discussions by states like New Jersey and New York, Rhode Island is barely noticed these days.

Still, the Ocean State bears watching. Its fiscal problems are, relative to its size, among the worst in the country. And the reform agenda (if you can even call it that) of its new governor, Lincoln Chafee, elected with union support and with only a plurality of the vote, is among the tamest in the nation. In Rhode Island we may get to see how the union version of fixing a state's problems via tax increases and the barest of reforms of government spending and employee entitlements works.

Ouch. Then, the laundry list:
Though smaller than its neighbors, Rhode Island very much bears the stamp of Northeastern politics and governing. It has the third highest level of public employee unionization in the country, 64 percent, behind New York and Connecticut. Its government is among the top 10 in the nation in per capita spending and in the tax burden it imposes on residents, plus the state has one of the least attractive business environments....

Rhode Island's long-term obligations compare unfavorably with just about any other state, and that's saying a lot....

the Daily Beast recently ranked Rhode Island the state most likely to go bust...

Moody's...ranked Rhode Island among the most troubled states on a variety of metrics...

A recent audit revealed that Rhode Island's biggest city, Providence, has been spending more than it budgets throughout the recession and depleting its reserve funds in the process, to the point where the city is almost out of cash....

[A]nother city, Central Falls, is insolvent thanks to $32 million in promised post-retirement health-insurance costs for its employees plus $48 million in pension obligations that the city can't meet on its own....

The burden this spending places on the private sector is significant. Rhode Island is not a state where businesses are investing in the future. An analysis of private sector investment several years ago by the Rhode Island Public Expenditure Council found investment per employee was among the lowest of any state, 30 percent below the national average. And while the state ranks only 20th in average private sector wage per worker, it ranks 4th in public sector pay.

Yay, us. Malanga also details the non-solutions being offered up by our Governor (and notes that Chafee only won with 36% of the vote). Just not good.

Comments, although monitored, are not necessarily representative of the views Anchor Rising's contributors or approved by them. We reserve the right to delete or modify comments for any reason.

I can't wait to see what Gov. Gump's budget will look like.
Tax increases?

Posted by: Bob at February 10, 2011 1:28 AM

When is Loser Linc going to make his State of the State which is "required" to be made in January?

Posted by: Tommy Cranston at February 10, 2011 7:57 AM


The RI House passed a bill last night extending the budget deadline to March 10.


My prediction is that if it makes it to the Governor's desk, he'll sign it.

Posted by: Andrew at February 10, 2011 9:07 AM

Where are Michael and all the other progressive and public sector union supporter commentators? I would have expected them to find some basis to attack Malanga's article.

There is a dog that is barking, my dear Watson.

Posted by: john at February 10, 2011 1:44 PM

Tommy, further to Andrew's response, the governor has decided not to give a State of the State this year but will combine the State of the State address with the presentation of the budget.

Posted by: Monique at February 10, 2011 6:50 PM

Thanks everybody.
Maybe he should have waited five days till the Ides...

Posted by: Tommy Cranston at February 10, 2011 7:54 PM
Post a comment

Remember personal info?

Important note: The text "http:" cannot appear anywhere in your comment.