Print
Return to online version

February 2, 2011

Watching the Intellectual Weight

Justin Katz

Juslia Steiny deployed an interesting simile, a couple of columns ago, that serves the opposite point than that which she makes:

However, standardized-test scores in isolation, alongside no other measures, are a hurtful, immoral misuse of good information. Parents value many features of a school as much, if not more than, achievement. Along with their academic prowess, private schools always tout their strengths in building strong characters, developing citizenship or attending to the whole child. When it comes to evaluating schools, the public-education industry tends to turn a deaf ear to these values.

Our current use of tests is like judging my health by my weight, while ignoring my bone density, cholesterol and whether or not I'm depressed.

Certainly, test scores are not sufficient for total judgment, particularly when it comes to schools and programs that promise more than a baseline education. Nonetheless, following Steiny's analogy, one can see school as an intellectual health program, and standardized test scores (including NECAP minimums for graduation) are like bare minimum requirements that even overweight, depressed participants should achieve if the program is to be said to have any value.

Sure, fat camp might be fun and reward campers with many friends, but if it consistently fails to reduce children's weight by measurable amounts, then it really isn't what it bills itself to be. Parents and those who subsidize it should assess expenditures accordingly.

Comments
Certainly, test scores are not sufficient for total judgment, particularly when it comes to schools and programs that promise more than a baseline education. Nonetheless... standardized test scores (including NECAP minimums for graduation) are like bare minimum requirements that even overweight, depressed participants should achieve if the program is to be said to have any value.

Not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that can be counted counts.
-- Sign on the wall of Albert Einstein's office at Princeton

Not that you guys need any data to support your faith-based approach to education "reform."

Posted by: Russ at February 3, 2011 11:58 AM

Anyone else find it curious that Monique invariably chimes in about the need for "proof" of scientific theories (an impossibility that illustrates only her unfamiliarity with the physical sciences), but accepts the unproven theory that standardized testing benefits students without question? Hmmm, I wonder why that is?
www.anchorrising.com/barnacles/012135.html

Posted by: Russ at February 10, 2011 10:30 AM