Anchor Rising: Justice Souter to Retire?

A Comfort of Consistency, by Justin Katz
Under the Government's Wing
5:48 PM, 07/ 5/10

Earning Happiness, by Justin Katz
Culture
1:46 PM, 07/ 5/10

Costa Encounters the Pitiful Enemy, by Justin Katz
Rhode Island Politics
9:31 AM, 07/ 5/10

Cutting the Cultural Meat Out of American Education, by Justin Katz
Education
8:24 AM, 07/ 5/10

Poetry of Life's Underlying Politics, by Justin Katz
Culture
8:26 PM, 07/ 4/10

A tribute to our country, by Donald B. Hawthorne
Liberty & American Founding
6:04 PM, 07/ 4/10

Blue Cross Advertisement from the Former Governor, by Justin Katz
Rhode Island Politics
4:49 PM, 07/ 4/10

I Can't Take It Anymore! Just One Small Post About Al Gore, by Monique Chartier
On a Lighter Note...
4:12 PM, 07/ 4/10

Civic Engagement Should Be Part of Life, by Justin Katz
Seeding the Grass Roots
11:58 AM, 07/ 4/10

Let's Be Clear: If You Oppose the Recent Changes to the Arizona Immigration Law, You Oppose United States Immigration Law, by Monique Chartier
Immigration
10:30 AM, 07/ 4/10

April 30, 2009

Judiciary

Justice Souter to Retire?

Carroll Andrew Morse

From National Public Radio, via Drudge...

NPR has learned that Supreme Court Justice David Souter is planning to retire at the end of the current court term.

The vacancy will give President Obama his first chance to name a member of the high court and begin to shape its future direction.

NBC, also via Drudge, says...

A court spokesman said Souter had no comment.

10:41 PM | TrackBack (0)

Comments, although monitored, are not necessarily representative of the views Anchor Rising's contributors or approved by them. We reserve the right to delete or modify comments for any reason.

Very interesting development. David Souter was a "Moderate Republican" appointment as I recall, but turned out to be a fairly reliable liberal voter. Obama would really have to go far out left to do worse than him.

In a certain way, I kind of feel bad for President Obama, as the discussion and fight over Souter's replacement is going to suck up a lot of political air. On the bright side, the discussion and fight over his replacement is going to suck up a lot of political air. ;)

Posted by: Will at April 30, 2009 10:51 PM

Shouldn't this be a slam dunk for whoever he wants? What can the Republicans really do about it even if he wanted to appoint Janeane Garafalo?

And even still, since Souter was always on the liberal side, what difference will it make?

Posted by: Patrick at May 1, 2009 8:55 AM

Souter has been a champion of preserving individual liberties granted by the Constitution. How is it 'liberal' to uphold and defend the Constitution?
I took an oath to uphold and defend the Constituion, does that make a 'liberal' too along with everyone else who has served in the military?

Posted by: Robert Balliot at May 1, 2009 10:19 AM

Straw man...

Posted by: Patrick at May 1, 2009 11:54 AM

"Souter has been a champion of preserving individual liberties granted by the Constitution."

Respectfully, no. His vote on the very important case of Kelo vs New London, in which he and four other Supremes not only misinterpreted but actually REWROTE the American Constitution, belies this assertion.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8331097/

Posted by: Monique at May 1, 2009 9:24 PM