Print
Return to online version

March 12, 2009

Corderre Opens the Socialist Umbrella Wide on Healthcare

Justin Katz

In a healthy political state, a legislator would be scared for her political life to propose such policies in a high tax state during a painful downturn:

Legislation introduced by Representative Coderre, (2009-H5519), would extend the reach of the RIte Track program, and establish a new "All Kids Health Insurance Program" to provide access to health insurance for an additional 1,000 to 2,000 or more children in the state.

The bill, which is before the House Committee on Finance, would extend RIte Care eligibility to children from families earning 300 percent of the federal poverty level, an increase from the current 250 percent. There are approximately 1,900 uninsured children in this income bracket, and the legislation would enable these children to enroll in RIte Care for an annual monthly premium of $135.

The bill also implements a buy-in program for children living in families with incomes over 300 percent FPL. Families taking advantage of the buy-in option would pay the full cost of the premium (which would include administrative and medical costs), to be determined by the Department of Human Services. It is estimated that 4,900 children in Rhode Island live in families with incomes above 300 percent FPL who don't have health insurance.

The legislation also reinstates coverage for immigrant children under age 10 who are lawful permanent residents in Rhode Island, restoring eligibility for about 1,100 legal permanent resident children who lost coverage during under last year's state budget, and including an anticipated 200 children per year in the future.

Three times the poverty level would be $52,800 for a family of three, $63,600 for a family of four, and $74,400 for a family of five. I've got the personal perspective that this legislation would bring my family within the coverage umbrella, and I'll admit that the only reason I'm struggling is a burden of debt, and my preferred solution to solving that problem would be to increase the opportunities for advancement available to my wife and me. Growing government would do the opposite, as the government seeks somebody to pay the expanding bill.

If we really want universal healthcare coverage, the solution is to decouple insurance from employment, chip away at the growing body of mandates and regulations, and make base-line coverage mandatory. Solutions like Coderre's will push us all closer to the pit.

Comments

You want to make health care cheaper?
Simple.
Tort reform; go to a system where the loser pays and you certainly won't see nearly as many malpractice suits, which will bring costs for doctors and hospitals way down.

Posted by: Andrew B at March 12, 2009 11:55 AM

Could this suggestion have been made at a worse time? General revenues for the state are down $300 million from last year to this. $300 million. Further, members of Rep Coderre's own party on the national level have claimed that the general economy is as bad as the 1930's. Even if that's an exaggeration, we're not in great shape.

Another thing. This expansion of the qualification parameters. How do any programs get paid for if, one by one, taxpayers get moved over to the receiving side of the state budget?

Posted by: Monique at March 12, 2009 12:55 PM

http://www.kickthemallout.com/

"Politicians are like diapers. They both need changing often and for the same reason!" ~Mark Twain

http://www.kickthemallout.com/

Posted by: Stephanie USA at March 14, 2009 5:07 PM

As we all await the windfall profits from the Democrat controlled Congress awarded “Porkopulus” Bailout, the OmnibusPork Bill and the Obama Budget titled A New Era of Responsibility, let us remember and re-learn lessons history has taught us:

Norman Mattoon Thomas (November 20, 1884 - December 19, 1968) was a leading American socialist, pacifist, and six-time presidential candidate for the Socialist Party of America.

The Socialist Party candidate for President, Norman Thomas, said this in a 1944 speech:

“The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of “liberalism,” they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.” He went on to say: “I no longer need to run as a Presidential Candidate for the Socialist Party. The Democrat Party has adopted our platform.”

England’s former Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher once said, “The problem with Socialism is that you eventually run out of other people’s money.”

Posted by: Stephanie at March 14, 2009 5:11 PM