I think the GOP can be more effective if we select the best of the DINOs and do a formal endorsement of their candidacy in the next election cycle. It will drive the "Lynch Mob" crazy!

I will research and provide a list, but I'm sure many of the Anchor Rising crowd knows who I mean.

Instead of making the Democrats crazy, you might be creating a target list.

John, the Lynch Mob already strongly backs most of the so-called DINOs, like Sue Menard, Ralph Mollis, Murphy, Montalbano, etc.
If you're Republican, do you really want to jump in bed with the likes of Menard (and her henchman John Dionne), Mollis, etc.? They're not just conservative. They're just the kind of corrupt officials you claim you're fighting against.

Donnis is right to an extent. If you put five Rhode Island Republicans in a room, the only thing that is agreed upon is that they don't like Democrats--oh, and that they like to bash one another more than they like to bash Democrats.

Carcieri is the only Republican holding a major elective office in the state today. And he wasn't even a Republican before he ran for governor.

The few GOP state legislator who have gotten elected have done so on their own.

So Donnis is right. Then again, no one can claim the RI GOP put RI into it current position.

The tiny Rhode Island Republican party has run itself into the ground.
The overpowering Rhode Island Democratic party has run the state into the ground.
Now which will Ian Donnnis choose to write about?
Typical limpwristed liberal! lol
Ian let us know when/if you're going to write anything of weight and substance r/t this state's mounting problems.
Tis fluff!

Ian is as much a journalist as Paris Hilton is an actor.

Tim, I wrote a lengthy piece in June about the state's worsening budget situation with input from an equal number of prominent Dems and Republicans:

http://thephoenix.com/article_ektid42724.aspx

Mike, if you want to continue to make such churlish ad hominem critiques, perhaps you could demonstrate "the maturity" to identify yourself. Anchor folks -- Andrew, Justin, Marc, etc. -- any thoughts on this?

Thoughts on what? Mike?

Yes, I think his comment was churlish and useless. I've said that you're fair-minded in your approach, and I find your writing considered.

In general, I find it doesn't serve anybody's interest to make much of such silly attacks.

But Ian, really, don't you find the almost complete silence of all factions in the RI Democratic Party in the face of a $600 million budget hole just a little bit strange?

Really, doesn't the near complete silence from Caprio, Roberts, Lynch, Lynch, Cicilline, Murphy, Montalbano, Montanaro, Walsh, Jerzyk, or (with a couple of minor exceptions) the poverty advocates bother you a bit?

On the other hand, I'm looking forward to your next big story on "Cornered by the Feds on One Side, and Economic Reality on the Other: What's a Good RI Dem to Do?"

Here is a clear-cut example of the professionalism of "journalist" Ian Donnis:
Yesterday, Ian posted a hit piece on Carcieri stating
"Carcieri reverses course on Cianci appearance

At 12:40 pm today, Governor Carcieri is slated make his first appearance on WPRO-AM's Buddy Cianci Show."

This post is on Ian's blog:
http://thephoenix.com/notfornothing/

REALITY:
Yesterday's appearance was NOT Carcieri's first on Cianci's show. He had appeared a few days earlier. Podcasts of both appearances of the governor are available free on the WPRO website:
http://www.630wpro.com/Sectional.asp?id=18073

CONCLUSION:
Ian's capabilities as a journalist can only be scorned when he posts as "fact" slanderous information on the state's highest elected official which can readily be seen to be lies by the most casual of internet users who hasn't spent a day in journalism school.
Donnis is a far-left polemicist who, in his unquenched thirst to promote the candidacy of Providence's corrupt mayor will ignore every bit of scandal and corrupption in his regime, to wit:
1. The doubling of the unfunded pension liability.
2. The crushing property tax increases and proliferation of boarded up
houses-unseen for 15 years.
3. The quiet cover-up of the Marcus Huffman case. A child molestor
left on the police force to rape another teen. Previously CONVICTED of
assault-he was not legally able to possess a firearm. The mayor and
his $200,000 police chief (another East Side Jew-how's that for
diversity-LOL) nonetheless left him on the force to continue his
sexual predation.
4. The pathetic blaming of the Head Start implosion on a mayor who
left office over 5 years earler.
5. The upcoming federal corruption trial of the mayor's brother on
charges of conspiring with yet more of the mayor's corrupt cops.
6. The "retirement" of the notorious John Simmons. A whole 4 years on
the job and he is getting a FULL PENSION, with lifetime COLA's.
7. The complete failure of the public schools as every East Side
hypocrite who "supports the public schools" demonstrates that support
by sending their own kids to private schools.

The only thing I can say positive about this "journalist" is that unlike hypocrite "free speech lover" Matt Jerzyk he has not (yet) banned me from his blog. Otherwise, as a journalist, he is a few sandwiches short of a picnic. He has as much credibility as Kate Brewster or Grace Diaz. Perhaps, with same touch of Leftist Insanity that puts four-times bankrupt on House Finance Ian will one day head the Brown Journalism program?
LOL

The last sentence above should read "four-times bankrupt Joe Almeida"

Let the Blame The Media game begin!

Ian,

Very disappointing how you run to all the usual suspects. Kate Brewster? Darrell West? Bob Walsh? Is there a master list of talking head Democrats you media Democrats use Ian? We see the same names also frequently quoted by the media Democrats at the Projo even though Brewster, Walsh and West aren't elected officials and have little if any little impact on anything. Ian there are so many ground breaking/news making things for you to write about in Rhode Island. Why aren't you?

John,

Couldn't have said it better myself. Rhode Island is such a target rich environment for the media yet vast tracks of this state's political and governmental turf is left unscathed by our 'journalism' community. Only one conclusion to draw, they're very protective of their own. lol

Mike,

Ian's whinefest about the governor talking by phone with Cianci is nothing new. (Personally find the Attorney General sitting in studio with the convicted felon much more offensive but hey that's me)
There is wild jealousy among many in the media towards talk radio. Same in the union community. Read Charlie Bakst column this morning. Can't you picture George Nee and Charlie running around with cartoon in hand? A hilarious visual! Their jealousy has them acting out as 3 year olds. The talk radio medium goes up the union arse sideways because they don't and can't control it in any way shape or form. The union dog is so threatened by talk they've attempted (and failed miserably) to get some of Dan Yorke's commercial sponsors to pull out. Always remember that Democrats love freedom of speech much the same way they love people of color and quality education. The term 'lip service' comes to mind immediately doesn't it? lol
Talk radio goes up the arse of other media because there is big money in it for the talkers as opposed to their much lesser paid old media brethren in print but more importantly because old media (print and tv) can't control the message anymore. Why does it bother other media so much (and it does) when the governor of this state routinely uses the radio airways to speak directly to the people who elected him? Why? Because old media likes to mold and shape and cut and paste "quotes" from elected officials so they can control the flavor and color of the message through their writing.
Talk radio removes their control.
That's why guys like Don Carcieri love the talk medium so much and will go on any show regardless of the political agenda of the hosts. There is no greater union wanker and Democratic party tool in the media than Scott McKay of the Projo. The governor has sat and done radio interviews with McKay on NPR. Why? Because the governor's voice and his words come directly from him and can't be shaped and molded and edited by the likes of Ian Donnis or Kathy Gregg or Scott McKay when in print form.

"Really, doesn't the near complete silence from Caprio, Roberts, Lynch,"

Small correction, John. Far from being silent, the Attorney General's response to the news of our dire fiscal problems has been to chuck us the bird by hiring two experienced campaign consultants at taxpayer expense, thereby also expanding the meaning of the term, "incumbent advantage".

If Carcieri hadn't said earlier that he wouldn't be talking to Buddy, this wouldn't even be an issue. Ian would not be able to call shenanigans on The Don if he hadn't made such a big deal of donning the white hat and pronouncing himself above talking to a convicted felon on-air. The Don done painted himself into a corner here.

He never said he "wouldn't" go on the show. He said "probably not" which is another way of saying "maybe".
With such a weak grasp of Logic 101 you should be teaching in our failed Soviet schools.

Parse if you'd like, Mike. Governor Whitehorse gave every indication he was above talking to Buddy, but then again, he is the ultimate arbiter of morals in Rhode Island, and you, I and Bishop Tobin are not.