November 8, 2006

"[T]he total failure of big government Republicanism"

Marc Comtois

I may have intimated it previously, but let me be clear: yesterday was a failure for Republicans, not for Conservatives. But Conservative Oklahoma Senator Tom Coburn adds an important qualifier (via Instapundit):

Although this election represents a short-term setback for Republicans, it could be an important turning point for the Republican Party and, more importantly, the country. Every incumbent was reminded that the American people, not party establishments, hold the reins of government... Many factors contributed to these election results. The American people obviously are concerned about the conduct of the war in Iraq... The overriding theme of this election, however, is that voters are more interested in changing the culture in Washington than changing course in Washington, D.C. This election was not a rejection of conservative principles per se, but a rejection of corrupt, complacent and incompetent government.

...Among the Republicans who lost their re-election bids a surprising number were political moderates who advocated a more activist government. Several Republican members of the appropriations committees, which have been on a spending binge, also were not re-elected. On the other hand, the two Republican senators who pulled off the most impressive victories were unapologetic conservatives, Jon Kyl (R-AZ) and John Ensign (R-NV). It is also notable that the Democrats who won or who ran competitive races sounded more like Ronald Reagan than Lyndon Johnson.

This election does not show that voters have abandoned their belief in limited government; it shows that the Republican Party has abandoned them. In fact, these results represent the total failure of big government Republicanism.

The Republican Party now has an opportunity to rediscover its identity as a party for limited government, free enterprise and individual responsibility. Most Americans still believe in these ideals...What Republicans cannot continue to do, however, is more of the same. Our short-term, politically-expedient, bread and circus governing philosophy has failed. Iraq is an important issue in the minds of voters but it is not the only issue. Our majority was severely weakened by a long series of decisions that pre-date the public’s current concern about Iraq.

Republicans oversaw a seven-fold increase in pork projects since 1998. Republicans increased domestic spending by nearly 50 percent since 2001, increased the national debt to $9 trillion, passed a reckless Medicare expansion bill and neglected our oversight responsibilities. While some of these decisions may have helped secure specific seats in the short-term the totality of our excess did not secure our majority, but destroy it.

There should now be less doubt about whether overspending and pork projects are bad policy and bad politics. This year, in particular, pork did not save our vulnerable incumbents but helped drag them down. The challenges facing our country are too great and complex for members of Congress and their staff to continue to be distracted by endless earmarking.

Some have said that Republicans and Democrats now need to govern from the middle. I disagree. We do not need to govern from the center as much as we need to govern from conscience. When politicians have the courage to argue their convictions and lose their political lives in an honest battle of ideas the best policies will prevail.

The American people do want civility but they also want real debate. Civility does not mean an absence of conflict, but a return of honor and dignity in our politics. The great debates in American history like the Lincoln-Douglas debates or the debates about the Constitution were intensely confrontational, but no one feels soiled after reading them. That same quality of debate is possible today if politicians put their country first and party second. The problems facing our country are too great to not have these debates. Voters are bored and tired of partisan role playing in Washington. The answers to securing Iraq, winning the War on Terror, and preventing the impending bankruptcies of Medicare and Social Security will not be discovered by portraying the other party as the focus of evil and corruption. If we don’t debate these issues with honor and agree on solutions we will be the first generation of leaders that left the next generation worse off, and we will see our relative power in the world diminish.

One of the great paradoxes in politics is that governing to maintain power is the surest way to lose it. Republicans have the ideas to solve our greatest challenges. If we focus on ideas, our majority status will take care of itself,” Dr. Coburn said.

Comments, although monitored, are not necessarily representative of the views Anchor Rising's contributors or approved by them. We reserve the right to delete or modify comments for any reason.

I agree completely

Posted by: Jane Comtois at November 8, 2006 4:34 PM

What are you smoking? Kyl and Ensign pulled off impressive wins?!? In a red state, Kyl managed to rally back to win by a 53-44 margin, hardly a landslide. Compare that to so-called RINO John McCain winning the very same state by a 77-21 margin.

Ensign did a little better winning 55-41, but neither of these seats should have been in ANY jeopardy. Heck, we came close to losing Bill Frist's seat in Tennessee!

When you move from Republican states to toss-up states, conservatives got whipped. Santorum lost, Talent lost, Allen lost, etc.

The first step to solving a problem is to identify and admit that there is a problem and Houston, we have a problem.

Coburn can talk all he wants about promoting conservativism from the friendly confines of Tulsa, Oklahoma, but Tulsa isn't the United States.

In 2004, the Democrats lost beacaue they failed to realize the US consisted of more than just the east and west coasts. Yesterday, Republicans lost because they failed to realize that the US consists of more than just Texas and Oklahoma.

Yes, conservatives need to get back to their roots and be far more careful about spending should they regain power again. But let's face it, the economy is going well and spending issues had little to do we yesterday's defeat.

Yesterday's defeat happened because the American public is uneasy about the war in Iraq and felt that the Congressional leadership was corrupt. There weren't many moderate in leadership positions and they can't be held accountable for these losses.

I am a conservative, but I'm willing to see the truth for what it is.

Posted by: Anthony at November 8, 2006 5:58 PM
Post a comment

Remember personal info?

Important note: The text "http:" cannot appear anywhere in your comment.